IN THE MATTER OF CARVER (Review Dept.2014) 5 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.348

State Bar Defense Attorneys Published Cases IN THE MATTER OF CARVER (Review Dept.2014) 5 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.348
0 Comments
In the Matter of Michael R. Carver (2014) | California State Bar Court

In the Matter of Michael R. Carver (2014)

5 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 348  |  Filed Nov. 6, 2014 (amended Dec. 4, 2014)  |  Review Department

Result: 90-day actual suspension within a two-year stayed suspension and two years’ probation; no credit for prior involuntary inactive enrollment. The decision clarifies that disbarment is not automatic after default if the attorney participates and that limited relief may be appropriate under Rule 5.85.
Attorney: Michael R. Carver (Member since 1999)
Case No.: 11-H-16868
Opinion by: Judge Epstein, with Presiding Judge Purcell and Judge McElroy concurring

Overview

This default case arose from Carver’s failure to comply with conditions of a prior public reproval that followed misdemeanor convictions for driving without a license and resisting an officer. After Carver failed to answer a Notice of Disciplinary Charges, the hearing judge entered default, ordered involuntary inactive enrollment, and—under the 2011 default rules—granted the Office of Chief Trial Counsel’s petition for disbarment. On interlocutory review, the Review Department held that the judge had discretion to consider appropriate relief when a response to a disbarment petition is filed, remanded, and ultimately imposed a substantially lesser discipline.

Key Facts

  • Prior discipline & conditions (2011): Public reproval required (1) contacting probation within 30 days, (2) quarterly reports, and (3) confirmation of compliance with criminal-probation terms. Carver missed these requirements.
  • Service & default: The NDC and default papers were properly served at his official bar address; actual receipt is not required in disciplinary proceedings. Carver later acknowledged actual notice.
  • Limited relief on remand: Facts in the NDC were deemed admitted; a limited hearing on culpability, aggravation, mitigation, and discipline proceeded without Carver’s participation (consistent with default rules).

Violations & Findings

  • Rule 1-110 (Reproval Conditions): Clear and convincing evidence established that Carver violated reproval conditions by failing to timely meet with probation, submit quarterly reports, and certify criminal-probation compliance.

Aggravation & Mitigation

FactorDetails
Aggravation
  • Prior record: The recent public reproval counted in aggravation.
  • Multiple acts: Three separate violations of reproval conditions, though they arose from a single order.
  • Dishonesty in seeking default relief: Misleading statements about notice and timing added limited aggravating weight.
Mitigation No mitigation established (member defaulted and presented no evidence).

Disciplinary Analysis

Applying Standard 2.10 (violations of discipline conditions), the Review Department concluded that a 90-day actual suspension with a two-year stayed suspension and two years of probation best protected the public. A two-year actual suspension was deemed excessive compared to similar cases imposing 60–365 days for failure to comply with reproval or probation conditions. The court also held that time spent on involuntary inactive enrollment under §6007(e) does not credit toward actual suspension.

Jurisdiction & Procedural Rulings

  • Service/Jurisdiction: Mailing to the official State Bar address satisfies service; actual notice is not required.
  • Due Process: Limiting participation after default and deeming NDC facts admitted were proper; any objections were waived by allowing default.
  • Rule 5.85 Clarification: Disbarment is not automatically mandated once a member responds to a disbarment petition; the hearing judge retains discretion to fashion appropriate relief.

Disposition

  • Stayed Suspension: Two years.
  • Actual Suspension: 90 days minimum, with standard probation conditions (quarterly reports, Ethics School, MPRE, compliance meetings, and responses to Probation). No Rule 9.20 order.
  • Costs: Awarded under §6086.10, enforceable under §6140.7.

Sanctions Table

Violation Rule / Statute Key Conduct Aggravation Mitigation Final Discipline
Failure to Obey Reproval Conditions Rule 1-110 (former); Standard 2.10 Missed probation meeting; no quarterly reports; no certification of criminal-probation compliance Prior reproval; multiple breaches; dishonesty in default-relief efforts None 90-day Actual Suspension + 2-year stayed suspension + 2-year probation; no credit for §6007(e) inactive time

Struggling with reproval or probation compliance?
East Bay Law P.C. helps attorneys navigate California State Bar conditions and audits.
Contact us for confidential guidance.

Categories:
In the Matter of Jeffrey Jason Olin (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 166
In the Matter of Jeffrey Jason Olin Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Gregory Daniel Trimarche (Review Dept. 2025) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 145
In the Matter of Gregory Daniel Trimarche Review Department (2025) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Rossana Pilar Mitchell (Review Dept. 2025) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 135
In the Matter of Rossana Pilar Mitchell Review Department (2025) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Respondent EE (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 127
In the Matter of Respondent EE Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.
In the Matter of Linda Darlene Lucero (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 101
In the Matter of Linda Darlene Lucero Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Respondent DD (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 90
In the Matter of Respondent DD Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.
In the Matter of Anthony Aanand Patel (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 84
In the Matter of Anthony Aanand Patel Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Elana Thibault (Review Dept. 2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 64
In the Matter of Elana Thibault Review Department (2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.
In the Matter of George Martin Derieg (Review Dept. 2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 46
In the Matter of George Martin Derieg Review Department (2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Respondent CC (Review Dept. 2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 36
In the Matter of Respondent CC Review Department (2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.