In the Matter of Jackson (Review Dept. 2003) 4 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 610

State Bar Defense Attorneys Published Cases In the Matter of Jackson (Review Dept. 2003) 4 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 610
0 Comments

In the Matter of Jackson

(Review Dept. 2003) 4 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 610

Overview

This case addresses whether a felony “wobbler” conviction that is reduced to a misdemeanor at sentencing under Penal Code section 17(b) remains a felony for State Bar disciplinary purposes. The Review Department held that under Business and Professions Code sections 6101 and 6102, the conviction remains a felony for State Bar purposes, even if reduced to a misdemeanor at sentencing or upon imposition of probation.

Facts

Jasmin Banks Jackson was admitted to practice law in December 1996. In November 2000, she was charged by felony complaint in San Bernardino County with assault with a deadly weapon or by means likely to produce great bodily harm in violation of Penal Code section 245(a)(1).

After a preliminary hearing, she was held to answer. On June 11, 2002, the first day of trial, she entered a plea of nolo contendere to the felony charge. The superior court expressly advised that she was pleading to a felony, though the judge indicated he might later reduce the offense to a misdemeanor at sentencing.

On June 17, 2002, at sentencing, the court reduced the offense to a misdemeanor under Penal Code section 17(b) and granted summary probation.

The State Bar filed a certified copy of conviction. The Review Department initially imposed interim suspension based on the felony conviction. The hearing judge later ruled that the conviction was a misdemeanor for State Bar purposes. The State Bar sought interlocutory review.

Issue

Does a felony wobbler conviction that is reduced to a misdemeanor at sentencing remain a felony for purposes of State Bar disciplinary proceedings?

Holding

Yes. Under Business and Professions Code section 6102(b), when an attorney pleads guilty or nolo contendere to a felony wobbler that was charged and declared as a felony, the conviction remains a felony for State Bar Act purposes, even if later reduced to a misdemeanor under Penal Code section 17(b).

Court’s Reasoning

1. Conviction Occurs at Plea

Under Business and Professions Code section 6101(e), an attorney is “convicted” when the plea of guilty or nolo contendere is entered. Jackson pled to a felony charge.

2. State Bar Act Controls Over Criminal Reclassification

Business and Professions Code section 6102(b) specifically provides that when an attorney pleads to a felony wobbler that is later reduced to a misdemeanor under Penal Code section 17(b), the conviction remains a felony for State Bar purposes.

3. Grade of Crime Matters for Interim Suspension and Summary Disbarment

The grade of the offense determines eligibility for interim suspension and summary disbarment. These determinations are reserved to the Review Department, not the Hearing Department.

4. Not All Wobblers Become Felonies

The court clarified that if the plea or verdict itself is to a misdemeanor charge — including a felony reduced to a misdemeanor at the time of plea — then it is treated as a misdemeanor. That did not occur here.

Procedural Disposition & Sanctions Status

Category Details
Underlying Criminal Offense Penal Code § 245(a)(1) – Assault with a deadly weapon
Plea Nolo contendere to felony charge
Criminal Court Action Reduced to misdemeanor at sentencing under PC § 17(b); summary probation granted
State Bar Classification Remains a felony for State Bar Act purposes
Interim Suspension Initially imposed based on felony conviction
Hearing Judge Ruling Found misdemeanor status (reversed)
Review Dept. Ruling Reversed hearing judge; confirmed felony classification
Final Discipline Conviction proceeding to resume; moral turpitude and discipline to be determined

Significance

Jackson clarifies that the State Bar Act independently defines the consequences of criminal convictions for attorney discipline. Even when a criminal court reduces a felony wobbler to a misdemeanor, the conviction remains a felony for State Bar purposes if the plea was to a felony.

The decision reinforces the Legislature’s intent that the regulatory consequences of criminal convictions in attorney discipline are not controlled by later criminal court reductions under Penal Code section 17(b).

Categories:
In the Matter of Jeffrey Jason Olin (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 166
In the Matter of Jeffrey Jason Olin Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Gregory Daniel Trimarche (Review Dept. 2025) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 145
In the Matter of Gregory Daniel Trimarche Review Department (2025) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Rossana Pilar Mitchell (Review Dept. 2025) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 135
In the Matter of Rossana Pilar Mitchell Review Department (2025) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Respondent EE (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 127
In the Matter of Respondent EE Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.
In the Matter of Linda Darlene Lucero (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 101
In the Matter of Linda Darlene Lucero Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Respondent DD (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 90
In the Matter of Respondent DD Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.
In the Matter of Anthony Aanand Patel (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 84
In the Matter of Anthony Aanand Patel Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Elana Thibault (Review Dept. 2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 64
In the Matter of Elana Thibault Review Department (2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.
In the Matter of George Martin Derieg (Review Dept. 2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 46
In the Matter of George Martin Derieg Review Department (2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Respondent CC (Review Dept. 2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 36
In the Matter of Respondent CC Review Department (2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.