In the Matter of William Benson Peavey, Jr. (Review Dept. 2002) 4 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 483

State Bar Defense Attorneys Published Cases In the Matter of William Benson Peavey, Jr. (Review Dept. 2002) 4 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 483
0 Comments
In the Matter of Peavey (2002) – Case Summary

In the Matter of William Benson Peavey, Jr.

4 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 483 (Review Dept. 2002)

Overview

Attorney William Benson Peavey, Jr. was found culpable of multiple acts of professional misconduct arising from loans he obtained from current and former clients to finance publication of his book, Dignity of the Soul. The Review Department affirmed the Hearing Judge’s findings and recommended discipline of three years’ stayed suspension with two years’ actual suspension and restitution.

Summary of Facts

The Henson Matter

Peavey had represented the Hensons intermittently since the 1970s. In 1994, while that fiduciary relationship still existed, he borrowed $25,000 from them at 10% interest to finance publication of his book. The Hensons borrowed $24,000 at 12% interest from their credit union in reliance on Peavey’s assurances that:

  • The book would be financially successful
  • They would be repaid in full within six months
  • Mr. Henson would not have to continue working

The loan was unsecured. Peavey did not advise them in writing to seek independent counsel and did not obtain written consent to the transaction.

The book venture was not profitable. Copies remained in storage. Peavey repeatedly assured the Hensons that repayment was imminent, citing fictional funding sources and anticipated sales. No payment was made.

The Hensons obtained a default judgment of $124,188.33, including punitive damages. Peavey failed to report the civil judgment for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty to the State Bar.

The Chamberlain Matter

Kevin Chamberlain was also a client in personal injury matters. In 1996, Peavey borrowed $25,000 from him, promising repayment of $30,000 plus interest within six months.

Again:

  • The loan was unsecured
  • No written advisement to seek independent counsel was provided
  • No written consent was obtained

Peavey misrepresented that funds were needed for a “second printing,” although unsold copies from the first printing remained. He repeatedly told Chamberlain that repayment was “imminent,” inducing him to make financial commitments in reliance on those promises.

Chamberlain obtained a judgment for $43,794.89.

The Herger Loan (Aggravation)

Peavey also borrowed $37,500 from a former client and friend, Donald Herger. This misconduct was uncharged but considered as aggravation.

Defenses Raised

  • No attorney-client relationship existed at the time of the loans
  • The judgments were merely unpaid debts, not reportable misconduct
  • Inability to repay does not constitute moral turpitude
  • He always intended to repay the loans
  • Two years’ actual suspension was excessive

The Review Department rejected these arguments, finding that the fiduciary relationship continued due to ongoing trust and influence, and that repeated misrepresentations elevated the conduct to moral turpitude under Business & Professions Code §6106.

Mitigation

  • No prior discipline in 21 years of practice
  • Extensive pro bono work in the Filipino community
  • Character testimony from six witnesses

However, the court discounted some mitigation because witnesses lacked full understanding of the misconduct.

Aggravation

  • Multiple acts of misconduct
  • Significant financial harm to clients
  • Indifference toward restitution
  • Uncharged similar misconduct (Herger loan)
  • Repeated dishonesty over several years

Detailed Sanctions & Misconduct Table

Count / Issue Rule or Statute Violated Nature of Misconduct Client Harm Discipline Impact
Failure to report civil judgment (Henson) Bus. & Prof. Code §6068(o)(2) Did not report civil fraud judgment to State Bar Delayed regulatory oversight Independent violation; increased seriousness
Improper business transaction (Henson) Rule 3-300 Unsecured loan; no written advisement or consent $124,188.33 judgment; elderly clients burdened with debt Major discipline driver
Moral turpitude (Henson) Bus. & Prof. Code §6106 Repeated misrepresentations regarding repayment and business status Clients misled for years Triggered Standard 2.3 – actual suspension required
Improper business transaction (Chamberlain) Rule 3-300 Unsecured loan; failure to advise independent counsel $43,794.89 judgment Compounded misconduct pattern
Moral turpitude (Chamberlain) Bus. & Prof. Code §6106 False statements about second printing and imminent payment Financial reliance damages Significant aggravation
Uncharged misconduct (Herger) Considered under Std. 1.2(b) Similar unpaid loan to former client Retirement funds affected Aggravating factor
Restitution Requirement Standard 1.4(c)(ii) Must repay judgments with interest Full financial restoration required Actual suspension continues until paid
Final Discipline Standards 2.3 & 1.4(c)(ii) Moral turpitude & fiduciary breach Multiple victims 3-year stayed suspension; 2-year actual suspension; restitution; proof of rehabilitation

Final Disposition

The Review Department recommended:

  • Three years’ suspension (stayed)
  • Three years’ probation
  • Two years’ actual suspension
  • Restitution to Hensons and Chamberlain with 10% interest
  • Proof of rehabilitation before reinstatement

The court emphasized that repeated dishonesty and breach of fiduciary trust warranted substantial actual suspension under Standard 2.3.

Categories:
In the Matter of Jeffrey Jason Olin (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 166
In the Matter of Jeffrey Jason Olin Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Gregory Daniel Trimarche (Review Dept. 2025) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 145
In the Matter of Gregory Daniel Trimarche Review Department (2025) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Rossana Pilar Mitchell (Review Dept. 2025) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 135
In the Matter of Rossana Pilar Mitchell Review Department (2025) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Respondent EE (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 127
In the Matter of Respondent EE Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.
In the Matter of Linda Darlene Lucero (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 101
In the Matter of Linda Darlene Lucero Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Respondent DD (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 90
In the Matter of Respondent DD Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.
In the Matter of Anthony Aanand Patel (Review Dept. 2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 84
In the Matter of Anthony Aanand Patel Review Department (2024) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Elana Thibault (Review Dept. 2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 64
In the Matter of Elana Thibault Review Department (2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.
In the Matter of George Martin Derieg (Review Dept. 2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 46
In the Matter of George Martin Derieg Review Department (2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct.
In the Matter of Respondent CC (Review Dept. 2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 36
In the Matter of Respondent CC Review Department (2023) 6 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr.